| ||||||||||
A Sociological Approach to the SimpsonsWritten by: Unregistered I’m going to start off by saying that until now I never actually thought there was a difference in the way those cartoon characters (the Simpsons) were approached, depending on their gender (not that I watched them too often or anything). First of all I’ll have to break the characters in two groups, because you cannot compare old people with children. So the first group will be composed of Lisa and Bart (the children) and the second one of Marge and Homer (the parents). Just by taking a glance at the show you see that it portrays the typical image of the “traditional American family” of the last decade: mom stays home to cook, clean and take care of the kids, while the husband provides for the family. The little boy is very violent doing a lot of “cool” things, and of course never studies, while the little girl is very quiet and smart. There are certain traces of stereotypes in almost all the activities in which the characters engage and that seems to be meant in a funny way. For example, in one episode, Lisa and Bart are taken hostages by a prison escapist in a zeppelin. Using a computer inside the zeppelin you could write on an electronic board outside the zeppelin. Lisa discovers that and writes a message to let everybody know that they are in there and in the middle of it she puts these flashing red hearts... I wonder if they would have done that if Bart were the one writing the message! This other time Bart gets himself a fake ID, rents a car and goes away for spring break with some friends (he of course lies to his parents); meanwhile Lisa stays home and has fun by going to work with her dad. What’s the message here? ‘Boys go off and do crazy things, but girls must stay home, close to the family.’ Bart is always the one who has all the adventures and does all the exciting funny things and Lisa is the smart quiet one always getting him out of trouble. She never holds any grudges, while Bart is mean to her most of the times and always gets his revenge; in other words ‘girls, you be silent, boys have the right to do anything.’ But enough of the youngsters, lets talk about the adults too. As I’ve said before, Marge is a housewife; she never directly disagrees with Hommie, her husband, and she’s always the one spoiling the children. She’s also the one doing all the house chores, while Homer enjoys himself in front of the TV. I remember in one episode how well it is showed the way men struggle to maintain the woman’s limitation to the house, and subsequently their economical dependence on them. One day, for some very stupid reason, Homer is fired. The whole family is tormented because they have no other income. Homer tries to get another job, but he fails. In a desperate state Marge proposes to get a job herself: big problem! “You?! Get a job? You can’t get a job; if you do who will take care of the kids and of the house then? And besides, you don’t know how to do anything.” He goes on arguing about his role in the family and that supporting them made him feel both a good husband and a good father. How about cooking for his kids... wouldn’t that make him a good father? It was incredible the way Homer made every skill that would have helped Marge get a job seem so useless and unimportant. Another significant thing is that everyday after work, Homer goes to this little bar (called Moe’s) to get drunk, but Marge never drinks. Also, most of the times when they are visiting somebody Marge helps her host (the woman I mean) clean up after dinner and is asking for recipes, while Homer talks to the “man of the house” about work and other “important things”. In conclusion, I’d say that the overall message that a little kid would get from these cartoons is that girls should be nice and quiet, always around their mothers, while boys are allowed to be naughtier and should be more independent.
|
| Arcallach 2001-01-03 05:00AM | |
|
That's ridiculous! You think the Simpsons are stereotypical? It's a little thing called ENTERTAINMENT. Not for everyone, mind you. Maybe those flashing red hearts on the zeppelin message just add an element of, hmm, say, humor? to the show? Of course Bart would not have done that; judging by his baseline behavior, it's just not something he would do! You see, not every family in the world is modelled after an entertainment figure, and no, the Simpsons most certainly AREN'T a typical family. Understand that that is what makes them funny. As for Lisa, well, you obviously haven't seen enough of the show to correctly judge the daughter situation. See, at school, most of Lisa's peers don't act the same as she does, but rather, shun her lifestyle. She's not popular because of her smarts, etc., thus meaning there aren't many others in her community like her; if the average American family is composed of a quiet, smart little girl, then why exactly is it that her classmates are all completely different from her? If she's one in a bundle, she can't possibly be very average. Bart? If you did your homework, you'd know he's the worst of the troublemakers at his school, and he's always the one rousing some kind of chaos. Now, Homer, you just look me in the eye and tell me that your father, among thousands of "typical American families" is a slow-minded, underachieved goon like himself. And if you can, I'm sorry, but I'm afraid you have a very pathetic view of the world's inhabitants; as well as those in the show. I think the show is very amusing, and I personally think you are making a very underrating and false statement about it. On behalf of Fox Entertainment, fans of the Simpsons, and the likewise, | |
| jas79 2001-05-07 07:00AM | |
|
I didn't mind your essay and your points are justified well. However, you may like to think on anotherlevel. Demographically, this program appeals to people of all ages, and it was designed to do so. Comments are dressed up for comical reception, either as voilence for young children (because they need a visual cue), sexual (for young teenagers), domestic for married couples to identify with, and political for older people and other "Elitists". It is actually a very clever composition, and its story lines always fulfill themselves to their themes, ie to be loved, or when Santa's little helper got sick - to look after your pets. When Bart forms an army to wip out a kid with waterbombs so hell stop bulling, a theme promoting kids to stick up for themselves. I bet execs were puzzling over this program for ages, as much as there is contoversial in the show, there is just as much tradition in story telling and theme. The ratings speak for themselves. Not that I am trying to stick up for the show, I am also concerned for the level of voilence, but more important is the fact that its a cartoon. I know many parents that think because it is a cartoon it ok and sit their kids in front of it and walk away. I guess the next generation will give us a clue to the affects. Well, Hope that gave you another perspective Contact me via email to chat anytime or on ICQ my number is 112779599 Bye Jason --------------------- | |
| cia 2001-05-08 07:00AM | No Rating |
|
First of all, Lisa Simpson does do more than just be quiet. She has several times spoken in public about her beliefs, taken on both politicians and big corporations. Most of the time she also succeeds in making her voice heard and actually making a difference in the world. Secondly, when the future of the Simpson children has been shown on the show, Bart ends up a total loser, and Lisa is very successful. When it comes to Homer Simpsons views, I believe that most people see that we are laughing at him rather than admiring him. The show is all about how stupid and ridiculous he is, not about that he is a role model. --------------------- | |
| MoonVegie 2001-05-10 07:00AM | No Rating |
| This essay was sooooo stupid and useless. who the heck cares about steriotypes about THE SIMPSONS! I mean, it is a friggin cartoon television show for gosh sakes!! does it really matter if stupid cartoon people have steryoptypes THAT ARE FUNNY!! I mean, some steryoptypes can be hilarious, like this!!!! I got some advice, THE SIMPSONS IS A CARTOON SHOW THAT IS SUPPOSED TO BE FUNNY AND STUPID! IT IS not TO BE TAKEN SOOOOOO SERIOUSLY! u idiot! :-( | |
| Lars2003 2001-05-13 07:00AM | |
| Overall this was a good article for proving your point. However, the Simpsons are for comic relief. I understand that some younger people would not see that, but other factors have to be taken into consideration. Lisa is not actually a traditional girl. She plays bari-sax and listens to Jazz. Most of us who are like that hang with the guys. Sure she is smart, but take a look at other TV programs. The girls are ditzy and not focused on studies. Lisa is ment to be the inspirational one of the show. She remains sane in an unstable environment. As for the rest of your article, way to go! | |
| cloebutterfly 2001-05-18 07:00AM | No Rating |
|
I agree that the Simpsons show all of the stereotypes that are offending to modern people and families. It shows the watcher the exagerated stereotypes that some people who have been raised to know. Woman are supposed to be helpless,frail,quiet,and obediant.That women are only good to clean the house and take care of the children. With the way the show represents life is almost as if you are back in the 1500's. I don't agree that children think that is the way children will see it. I first watched the Simpsons when I was 8 or 9. All I used think about it was that it was funny. Homer and Bart were stupid and Lisa and Marge would have been cool if they had been more out going and stronger. Parents have the responsibility of not letting their children think that life isn't like that by showing them the way their family is. I think the simpsons is harmless but I don't think that everybody should watch it everyday. Everybody can draw their conclusions from a tv show and that is mine. | |
| texas_teddy_bear 2001-06-02 07:00AM | No Rating |
|
The writer of this essay was right in saying that he/she doesn't watch this show too often or anything. Even a glimpse of the show lets someone know that this is no stereotype of families of yesteryear. To prove my point, ask yourself: When you think about families before the Internet do you think of: a dad that can crush a beer can by rippling his stomach a daughter that co-creates a non-stereotypical (hmmm?) Barbie type doll a son who has an evil genius (sp?) for a mortal enemy whose plans he has thwarted on many occasions a mom who is a head vampire (Halloween episode) and has a 2 1/2 foot blue beehive a baby who has shot the town billionaire the whole family has been kicked out of all but two states I could go on about how the family is not a stereotype but I think you get the picture. It's just a show, meant for entertainment purposes with a few SAT words and lots of parody. Anybody who takes anything in this show so seriously (that includes those people who created a college course about The Simpsons) probably needs to see a shrink. (Have I gotten overinvolved myself?) --------------------- colors | |
| tibbyshosh 2001-06-03 07:00AM | |
|
While I appreciate your attempt to deconstruct The Simpsons and point out flaws in the show's gender representation, you fail to see the most obvious and beautiful part of The Simpsons: it's all satire. The show thrives on stereotypes. Every single character fits into a stereotype. Be it the salty sea captain, the overly wimpy Christian neighbor, the drunken children's entertainer or, the most show's obvious stereotype, the Indian convenience store owner. Since this show is NOT for children, these stereotypes serve as an in-your-face mockery of the American viewers. When you watch The Simpsons, you need to realize that Lisa, is actually the most redeeming character. Her brilliance is continually celebrated. She cares about the environment - in one episode going so far as to ask her mother if she can spend spring break cleaning up after and oil spill. She is a vegetarian that manages to sabotage her father's meat ridden BBQ. She is a talented saxophonist. She is even a member of Mensa. Lisa gets Bart out of trouble, not because she has to, but because she loves her brother and she feels sorry for his inferior intellect. Perhaps I digresst, but your argument lacks any depth. If you are concerned with how the media influences little girls, then look at Barbie dolls, Britney Spears and just about any animated Disney movie. These are the true enemies of our young sisters. | |
| zzrbfzz 2001-08-27 07:00AM | No Rating |
| Holy crap, "you are retarded!" What the hell are you talking about. I think that anyone who just sat through and read your essay has actually become dumber. Nowhere in your incoherant writing was there even a trace of a good point. As an avid viewer of the Simpsons, I take personal offense to this ridiculios essay and believe that it should never be allowed to be read by anyone ever again. You mam, are a moron. Have you actually ever taken time to enjoy the Simpsons? I don't think so, because if so, you would have realized that you are completely wrong. Listen: Of course the show is going to be stereotypical, that's what makes it funny. And if anything the antithesis of your paper may actually make more sense than this B.S. that you wrote. After watching this program, the clear message is to do everything the opposite of how the Simpsons do things. You aren't supposed to use them as model family, you are supposed to use them as a model of what NOT to do, you dumbass. So, next time, just think before you write. | |
| hello6am 2001-09-18 07:00AM | |
|
Good god almighty... I can see why you tried to do this essay, but the result is such an incredibly shallow analysis that, instead of offering insight into a subject people may have not realised there was a great deal of depth to: you have only proved there ISN'T actually enough to discuss. Therefore, you are only able to make blatanty obvious (and spurious) points relevant to sketchy examples. It hasn't worked, and makes you look very unintelligent. | |
| ReverendLisa 2001-10-18 07:00AM | No Rating |
|
What's that overpowering smell that appears when I watch The Simpsons? Ah yes, its SARCASM. I appreciate the fact that you are aware of stereotypes and inequality but you are barking up the wrong tree. Lisa, the character that you reported to be the most maligned, is the heroine of the show. Homer, the one you seem to make out to be the big winner, is the joke. Did you honestly miss these points? --------------------- | |
| sidney 2001-10-20 07:00AM | |
|
To see the genius of this essay, one has to include the comments generated and the subsesquent discussion. The Simpsons is obviously a satire which has ROFLOL invoked responses to the stereotypes depicted. Some commentors suppose the author so shallow as to actually believe the show is intended to be a role model for modern behavior. The essay has caused people to respond, usually those that DO regularly watch the Simpsons. (on FOX) For that, it rates a 10 for acheiving the unstated objective. BTW, in my market, it is shown nearly every day. Wish I had the time to watch. I think I read/heard the series has released a whole year of epidsodes on tape/DVD. Sidney [where is the spell-checker?] | |
| JakeWood 2001-12-13 05:00AM | No Rating |
|
Everyone on the Simpsons is a steryotype, more than likely on purpose. Way to state the obvious. Your essay was awful. --------------------- Go to jakewood.50megs.com for amature backyard fighting (not wrestling) and 18 year old boys | |
| screamingbutterfly 2001-12-17 05:00AM | |
|
The simpsons is a fascinating farce on society and I think you are on the right track, however you have mentioned "messages" and not explained them in depth. With TV shows I find repeated exaples are needed to prove that "message" is consistent with the shows ideology, since each episode is so different. I think you have oversimplified the characters.... boys shoudl be more independent? Lisa's predicted success/independence from her high IQ has been the topic of many episodes. When she campaigned against the seixst doll, became president, etc. I think you are looking at what you already know and expect rather than whats really there. --------------------- ~Heather~ | |
| lazy_man 2002-03-16 05:00AM | No Rating |
| im going to be blunt here, what were u thinking!! are u totally lack a sence of humour or just deperate to give your keyboard a work out? the whole idea of the simpsons is to be funny! this is almost as stupid as the story i saw the other day about how bob the builder encourages bad work place health and safety! | |
| batoutofhell79 2002-03-23 05:00AM | |
|
1. I think you make some valid points but your stylistic presentation leaves a lot to be desired. 2. Your points need further explanation and your referencing is poor at best. 3. Clearly I don't know how old you are but the overall standard is that of a 13 yr old student. 4. I think that some of the points made by other reviewers are worth looing at but anyone who believes that The Simpsons has no sociological impact is misguided. 5. It was a promising title but a poor essay that requires a lot of work. If you need any further stylistic advice E-mail me. --------------------- Everything is relative, success in life is making relativity work for you. | |
| DarthSpud 2002-04-08 07:00AM | |
| The message in the essay is good and the concrete details thouroughly support the argument: however, the approach seems very juvenille. Perhaps by increasing vocabulary, changing the syntax, as well as the commentary, the essay will project the argument clearer. | |
| flucloxacillin 2002-04-14 07:00AM | |
|
You have obviously missed the whole point of The Simpsons and the messages which it tries to get accross. Sure you could take it at face value and say that it teaches people bad attitudes, but have you ever heard of sarcasm? What the producers of the show are doing with The Simsons is: 1- To be hugely entertaining and funny. 2- To parody those old American family shows. 3- To show that even though peoplke can have very big problems, that doesn't necessarily make them bad people, a-la the endings where the family end up strengthening their bonds. --------------------- | |
| Uzzi 2002-09-13 07:00AM | No Rating |
| Simps0nz OWN | |
| Uzzi 2002-09-13 07:00AM | No Rating |
| Ok ok, u probably think im the most unsophisticated,ignorant person in the world 4 sayin that, however, when the olympics were on inSydney i watched the Simpsons "fanfest" which is 24 hour non sop simps0nz...Why u ask? What can i say? Im a big fan, its a hilarious show. And in many ways portray what MOST families are like. 7th Heaven on the other hand is a Bullshit show due to the fact it is unrealistic... | |
| radelle 2002-09-26 07:00AM | |
| Not very accurate or entertaining. | |
| Nato 2002-09-29 07:00AM | No Rating |
|
1. Isn't it time we distinguished between a fictional situation that happens to fall within the lines of a stereotype (whether intentional or not) and an attempt to perpetuate the stereotype? Is portraying the wrong in life is not the same as encouraging it? Did Schindler's List encourage or discourage antisemitism? Lighten up, just do your part. If you want women to go to work, then go work. If you want them to get drunk after work like Homer, then go get drunk after work. If you want little girls to be lazy and wild like Bart, ... Be realistic, for the sake of your cause. | |
| Stevo_M 2002-10-16 07:00AM | No Rating |
|
u sound like the BIGGEST feminist (yes, that is a bad thing). The Simpsons is a comedy... get over it | |
| aznd3m0n246 2006-01-10 05:29PM | |
| seriously, comedy are suppose to make fun of things. even though it has alot of crap, it makes people laugh. and thats the whole point of this show | |
| in2lectual 2006-02-06 01:46PM | |
|
yeah right! Lisa never does anything...BS! She makes speeches about politics and enviroment. I think that lisa is a symbol of the new generation of women that have emrged in todays society. We're smart,energetic, and in some cases, can take a job and grab it by the balls better then men. Marge does represent the old traditions agreed. ANd bart is just the juvinele delinqeunt that everyone knows. But he also does try to help other people...at times.Another thing about the simpsons is that not only does it take apart and shred definitions of traditions, it's taking steps in making known cases of irony and making discreet jabs at the political and sociual systems of the states. I love the simpsons and anyone who says that it's sex biased is crazy Peace out!! --------------------- Shianne | |
| Locke 2006-03-19 02:26PM | No Rating |
| Silly feminists. | |
| heartion 2006-03-27 09:49AM | No Rating |
|
Stop with the critisims! I think we can all agree on the fact that the essay was a piece of shit. Let it stop here. Seriously, lets not get mad and fussy over a piece of shit. Therefore, I take the liberty to announce... The essay: "A Sociological Approach to the Simpsons" found on | |
| apollo_crash 2006-09-09 08:02PM | |
| Do you all need to be so harsh? Judging from the essay it was probably written by someone quite young who is new to essay writing. They had a crack at it and obviously posted it for a bit of encouragement. Lame, lame, lame to criticise something so inoffensive. | |
| spammyb09 2006-12-07 05:45PM | |
| if it was a first time attempt, why pick such a specific topic, if the poster had the guts to put it up, they should have the guts to take criticism | |
| PlanetPapers.com | Contact Me | Copyright © 2006 | Privacy Policy | Add to Favorites |