Essay IndexEssay Index
Custom WritingCustom Writing
Admission Essay HelpAdmissions Help
Submit an EssaySubmit an Essay
FAQ / HelpFAQ / Help
Question and Answer forumsQ & A Forums
Essay LinksEssay Links
Link to PlanetPapersLink to us
Contact UsContact Us
 
 
 
What's New | Top10 Essays | Login or Signup 

Enter Your Paper Topic Here:
        
     

CLICK HERE FOR MORE THAN 50,000 PAPERS

  • Read User Comments
  • Rate/Comment on this essay
  • Cite this essay: MLA, APA
  • Print this essay
  • Eighteenth Century Philosophers: A Comparison

    Written by: Isiaca

    The "Enlightenment" or the "Age of Realization" was an age of great advancement and reform for all of Europe and beyond. Great advancements were being made in the fields of science, philosophy, mathematics, and logic. Most people attribute these achievements to the social critics of that time, also known as the philosophes. These philosophes were controversial thinkers and pioneered the intellectual movements of the 1700's. They stood up for what they believed in, although they were constantly criticized and censured by many other people. Such philosophers include Descartes, Hobbes, Locke, and Voltaire. Although their beliefs violently contradicted, they were all working to change what they thought was wrong with their present government. They were four men who disagreed about almost everything, and yet they were working towards a common goal. This is how the Age of Enlightenment became a reality.

    Rene Descartes was a French philosopher, mathematician, and scientist. He was born in La Haye, France (now called Descartes) in 1595. Unlike some other Enlightenment thinkers, he relied on logic and math in his reasoning. He was educated at the Jesuit College of La Fleche. It is thought that his most important influence was a man named Isaac Beeckman. It was with this man that Descartes discussed math, philosophy, and physics. This man was his friend and trusted colleague. In 1618 Descartes served in the army of Prince Maurice of Nassau. It was Descartes theory that stated, "the discovery of proper method is the key to furthering scientific advancement." Descartes was responsible for a number of very influential works including Rules for the Direction of Mind, Le Monde (The World), Discourse on Method, Meditationes de Prima Philosophia (Meditations on the First Philosophy), The Principles of Philosophy, and Les Passions de l'ame (Passions of the Soul.) He coined the phrase, "Cogito Ergo Sum," in English meaning, "I Think Therefore I Am." Although Descartes died in Stockholm in1650, his words have lived on for many centuries and will survive through many more.

    Thomas Hobbes was born in London, England in 1588. He was educated at Oxford University in England where he studied the classics. In 1651, Hobbes wrote his most famous book, Leviathan. In this book he argued that most people were born evil and could not be trusted to govern themselves. He thought that a ruler needed to have complete control over his people to govern efficiently. His idea was to have something to force the people to obey their ruler at all costs. He called this document the Social Contract. He thought that giving power to an individual would start a "war of every man against every man" and make life "solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short. "Although these thoughts may seem to label Thomas Hobbes as a supporter of an authoritarian government, he favored a representative democracy. He coined the phrase, "voice of the people," but he thought that this "voice" should be vetoed if a ruler deemed it proper.

    John Locke was born in 1632 at Wrinton in Somerset, England. He opposed the views of Thomas Hobbes and thought that people were born neither good nor evil. He believed that people's characters were solely based on their experiences and their environment. He also believed that people could learn from their experiences and change their characters for the better. He believed that people had three Natural Rights- life, liberty, and property. In Locke's eyes, the purpose of the government was to protect the people's Natural Rights. He thought that if the government was not doing this job, that the people had the right to overthrow it. Although it may seem that Locke would support a democracy, he was not a democrat. He believed that laborers were of a lower status that the middle and upper classes and had no place meddling in the affairs of the government. He believed that the poor had neither the education nor the inclination to make political decisions responsibly. This was a popular belief of the time.

    Francois-Marie Arouet de Voltaire was born in Paris France to a wealthy family. He was raised a deist and a liberal. He was educated at Louis de Grand, a Jesuit College, where he was exposed to both Latin and French theatre. Although his father wanted him to study the law, Voltaire abandoned the idea for philosophy and his interest in theatre.

    Voltaire is famous for his satirical poetry and controversial works, many of which never became published because they were so astonishing to the society. He wrote poems and plays that made a mockery of the French government and society. He encouraged free speech among his colleagues and friends and is sometimes remembered by this line, "I disapprove of what you are saying, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." Voltaire fought for a limited government and was arrested twice for insulting nobles. It is said that this great man published over 70 books of political essays, philosophy, history, and drama. Voltaire died in his sleep at the age of 84, a hero. This rebel's contribution to the field of philosophy will never be forgotten because it helped to free the minds of the people of the eighteenth century from the hypnotic drone of former life.

    Each of these enlightenment thinkers has a different view about people and about life. Each in their own way, I can relate to all of these philosophes. For example, I agree with the ideas of democracy presented by Thomas Hobbes. I can also relate to the beliefs of John Locke. I also believe that people are influenced by their experiences and environments. I also think that if given the chance I would encourage Voltaire's rebellious behavior and satirical views of government. I also agree with the ideas of Descartes. I think that math and logic are important keys to decipher human philosophy. Who could pick only one of these amazing thinkers of the Enlightenment era? Not I. I would rather do as Rome did to Greece: take what I like and adapt it to fit me. Perhaps I could be one of the Enlightenment thinkers of the Two thousand tenth century. Perhaps I could have the great honor and recognition to be called a philosophe.


    CLICK HERE FOR HUNDREDS OF ADDITIONAL HISTORY ESSAYS



    User Comments

    dan
    2001-02-21 05:00AM
    No Rating
    At the risk of sounding rude i must say that this is an awful essay, both historically and stylistically. Ignoring the fact that 3 of the 4 thinkers addressed were not actually philosophes (Descartes, Hobbes and Locke were important precursors to the enlightenment but produced works around a century earlier), there is little or no grasp of what the enlightenment (age of reason NOT realisation) actually was. It seems odd that someone would entitle an essay 'eighteenth century philosophers' and then discuss seventeenth century ones; the lack of discussion of Rousseau, Diderot and Kant is almost blasphemous(!) as indeed is the avoidance of the secular nature of the works in a time still rocking from the reformation. The author tends to throw in soundbites without any evidence or explanation, some of the comments really do begger belief; "his words have lived on for many centuries and will survive through many more" really?, "It is said that this great man published over 70 books" who says? surely he either did or he didn't - this suggests to the reader that no research at all has taken place. "the hypnotic drone of former life" huh?!, the author obviously likes to try to end each paragraph with a snappy catchphrase but forgets that 1. it needs to make sense and 2. that linking to the next paragraph is far more important. I think that if i discuss the conclusion then i may risk becoming just plain rude (if i haven't already) but just to say that if i decide to put in my own opinion (i don't do that much obviously) i do so with extreme caution. The analysis can not merely be "i agree" full stop. You get no credit just for agreeing with an acclaimed thinker without saying why; if the philosophes had thought like that then the enlightenment would never have happened.
     
    yesım
    2002-04-18 07:00AM
    2 out of 5
    thee ıs also machiavelli who ıs also a famous physlopher
     

    You must log in or signup to post comments

    FRIENDS
    Essay.org
    MostPopular-term-Papers.com
    1MillionPapers
    OPPapers
    AntiEssays
    HotEssays
    BigNerds
    FastPapers.com
    EssayWorld
    AntiStudy
    EssayWriters
    eCheat.com
    NetEssays
    ChuckIII.com
    CollegeTermPapers
    Reportfinders.com
    Term Paper Sites
    EssayFinder.com
    termpapers-on-file.com
    15000papers.com
    termpapermasters.com


    Tell a friend about this siteCLICK HERE
    Tell a friend
    about this site.