Essay IndexEssay Index
Custom WritingCustom Writing
Admission Essay HelpAdmissions Help
Submit an EssaySubmit an Essay
FAQ / HelpFAQ / Help
Question and Answer forumsQ & A Forums
Essay LinksEssay Links
Link to PlanetPapersLink to us
Contact UsContact Us
 
 
 
What's New | Top10 Essays | Login or Signup 

Enter Your Paper Topic Here:
        
     

CLICK HERE FOR MORE THAN 50,000 PAPERS

  • Read User Comments
  • Rate/Comment on this essay
  • Cite this essay: MLA, APA
  • Print this essay
  • Hamlet's Madness

    Written by: Yogi36

    In Shakespeare's classic play Hamlet, many people look at it from two very different point of views. Each of them changes the outcome of the story. Hamlet mentions many times in the play that he is not crazy but only acting crazy to avenge his father's death.

    The way that people look at the situation makes the outcome very important. Now from the beginning of the play Hamlet is debating on how to handle the revenge of his Dads death. The plan that he goes with first is to act like he is crazy or Hamlets words "As perchance to put on antic disposition." That is the first big clue that he is just acting.

    Now the reasoning for acting crazy in his plan for revenge is for everybody to think that he killed Claudius at the spur of the moment and not a pre meditated deal. In the end to maybe save his life from the punishment of Murder. Hamlet contemplates many times throughout the play on the value of human life and if he could actually take someone's life. So he keeps doing weird stuff convincing people that he really is crazy. In Act 3 Scene 4 his Mom the Queen says "Alas he is Mad." This shows that his plan is working out so far.

    During Hamlet's act of playing crazy and planning to kill Claudius it has helped him find the real value of human life. In Hamlets "To Be or not to Be" speech he ponders the value the value of his own life and the value of Claudius life in retrospective to his own life. He wonders does one murder really warrant another person to die. Now If Hamlet was truly crazy he would not of spent all on this careful planning and thought. He would have killed him a few hours after seeing the ghost of his Dad. Hamlet has reasoning and morels enough not just to run out and kill someone.

    During Hamlet's debate on what to do about his Fathers death, many other big events happen. First he kills Polonaise thinking that he was the king hiding behind the curtains. To Hamlet that is a big event because it proves to himself that if he had to do it he could. He could kill someone that he doesn't care for too much. But when Ophelia dies he has to deal with loosing another loved one from the chain reaction that started from his Dads death. So this makes hi even angrier about his fathers death.

    "With heated visage as against the doom is thought sick in the act." Now does a crazy man plan a murder with such thought? After looking at all of the details it all comes down to your personal interpretation of the situations. Hamlet mentions many times in the play that he is not crazy but only acting crazy to avenge his father's death


    CLICK HERE FOR HUNDREDS OF LITERATURE ESSAYS



    User Comments

    Maknithe
    2002-10-07 10:00AM
    2 out of 5
    First, I liked your essay. The first line needs a little attention though.. it’s hard to get through.. maybe something like, “People tend to take two very different points of view on the question of Hamlet’s Madness in Shakespeare’s classical play, “Hamlet.”


    “Now the reasoning for acting crazy in his plan for revenge is for everybody to think that he killed Claudius at the spur of the moment and not a pre meditated deal. “
    I thought this was a really awesome idea.

    But then saying that if he were crazy, he would have killed Claudius within a few hours is just wrong. You can’t make an assumption like that and call it a supporting detail. Maybe if he were more clear headed and less crazy he would have killed Claudius immediately after his father’s telling.. it was the practical, noble thing to do- avenging his father’s death by his father’s command.


    “During Hamlet's debate on what to do about his Fathers death, many other big events happen. First he kills Polonaise..."
    Was that really first? What about the play? What about the fact that he was confronting his mother? But then you redeem yourself with
    “To Hamlet that is a big event because it proves to himself that if he had to do it he could. He could kill someone that he doesn't care for too much.”
    Which i think is another interesting observation, proving to him that he could kill. But it may be a mute point if you think that maybe he DOES care for his uncle.. perhaps that is also the reason he didn’t kill him right off the bat.

    “After looking at all of the details”
    you didn’t.
    “it all comes down to your personal interpretation”
    Duh. Doesn’t need said.
    “Hamlet mentions many times in the play that he is not crazy but only acting crazy to avenge his father's death.”
    In proving a man is not crazy, how much weight can you really place on his own words? This ending is weak and makes the overall essay look like you’re saying, ‘Hamlet isn’t crazy because he said so.’ Okay, so.. yeah.. Now you’ve lost all point. Which side are you on? From the rest of the essay it can only be assumed that you feel Hamlet was not crazy, but only acted crazy as a device to bewilder his company. If this is your Thesis, (or whatever your main idea is) it needs to be more apparent.


     

    You must log in or signup to post comments

    FRIENDS
    Term Paper Masters
    Essay.org
    TheEssayStore
    MostPopular-term-Papers.com
    1MillionPapers
    FastPapers.com
    EssayWorld
    EssayWriters
    eCheat.com
    NetEssays
    ChuckIII.com
    CollegeTermPapers
    Reportfinders.com
    Term Paper Sites
    EssayFinder.com
    termpapers-on-file.com
    15000papers.com


    Tell a friend about this siteCLICK HERE
    Tell a friend
    about this site.